Canada Opinion: Liberals' Broken Promise To Fix National Security Laws Risks Our Rights

15:37  17 may  2018
15:37  17 may  2018 Source:   huffingtonpost.ca

In top 10 election issues, Ontario voters don’t trust the Liberals: Ipsos poll

  In top 10 election issues, Ontario voters don’t trust the Liberals: Ipsos poll The top election issue on the minds of the Ontario people is healthcare, and 35 per cent of respondents said they’d trust Andrea Horwath and the NDP to best deal with that.When it comes to which political party they think would best deal with the many issues facing Ontario during the 2018 election, voters at least know who they don’t trust: the Liberals.

The Liberal government has broken another election promise , this time to address deep-seated problems in our country's national security laws . As a result, the government is failing to protect us against mass surveillance

Similarly, national security risks include, in addition to the actions of other nation states, action by Even where the exercise of national security is subject to good governance and the rule of law , a risk They range widely from political assets such as the Bill of Rights , our political institutions and

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

The Liberal government has broken another election promise, this time to address deep-seated problems in our country's national security laws. As a result, the government is failing to protect us against mass surveillance, secret policing and other national security activities that threaten our most basic rights and freedoms.

With their flagship national security law, Bill C-59, the Liberal government had committed to checking off a key platform plank: eliminating the worst aspects of the Conservatives' highly contested Bill C-51 and putting rights and freedoms at the heart of our national security laws.

NDP Leader Andrea Horwath promises boost to health care services in Brampton

  NDP Leader Andrea Horwath promises boost to health care services in Brampton The NDP is promising a new hospital in Brampton and an expansion of Peel Memorial so it offers a full range of health services.Saying health care has not kept up with the booming population in the area, NDP Leader Andrea Horwath said “the long waits in Brampton have gotten worse and worse, while the number of patients left on gurneys in hallways has grown I will work closely with the City of Brampton to make it happen.”Speaking in Brampton, flanked by local NDP candidates, Horwath said a site is already under consideration and that funding and timelines for the city’s third hospital will be determined in the days to come.Read more:NDP platform crafted on a ‘major mistake’ that means at least $3B in cuts, Libe

Opinion . The Liberals unanimously voted for C-51. During the election, they promised to “repeal the problematic elements of Bill C-51, and introduce new legislation that better balances our collective security with our rights and freedoms.”

Liberals to introduce bills to reform Access to Information and national security laws . Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines.

  Opinion: Liberals' Broken Promise To Fix National Security Laws Risks Our Rights © Provided by AOL Inc.

That bill, officially the National Security Act, 2017, just finished a marathon study at the House Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, to little fanfare.

Normally, committee studies don't draw a lot of attention: committees are usually limited in what they can change, and are dominated by the governing party; opposition amendments seldom get through.

This committee study would be different, promised Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale. In a little-used parliamentary procedure, the government sent Bill C-59 to committee earlier than usual, allowing MPs (in theory) to make more substantial and consequential changes to the bill. It was presented as a goodwill gesture and a sign of the government's commitment to amending a bill that had already raised red flags.

Ontario Liberals slam NDP platform costing

  Ontario Liberals slam NDP platform costing TORONTO - Ontario's governing Liberals claimed Monday to have found a costing error in the NDP election platform, marking yet another attack on the third party that has been gaining momentum, as the New Democratic leader stood by her plan and ruled out any possibility of a coalition to keep the Tories from seizing power. The province's election campaign has increasingly seen the Liberals take aim at the NDP after months of focusing their attacks on the Progressive Conservatives led by Doug Ford.Liberal Premier Kathleen Wynne said just because her party and the NDP have similar values, doesn't mean she won't ask questions about their platform.

Trump with Steve Bannon ( right ) and Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in- law , during a swearing in ceremony at the White House: ‘It all adds up to WTF, if I may put it that way. The SDSR was based on the National Security Risk Assessment of 2015. That assessment states, quite rightly : “ Our

Top Stories. Local. The National . Opinion . Prime minister-designate Justin Trudeau won election last week promising to fix or flush a number of contentious Conservative laws . Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines.

Promises of openness don't result in change

After dozens of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of briefs and hundreds of proposed changes from a wide-range of organizations, last week we got the result: Of more than 100 opposition amendments proposed, a total of four were adopted. I sat through the hours of debate on each clause of the bill. Systematically, opposition motions were rejected, on often the flimsiest grounds. No amendments were made that didn't go in the direction that the government had already set out.

With the complexity of the bill and the scope of testimonies delivered to the committee, you would think a verdict on this bill would be difficult. It isn't: No substantial changes were made to Bill C-59 at committee, especially regarding protecting our rights and freedoms, despite promises of openness to doing so.

From mass surveillance to continuing the unfair, ineffective No Fly List, and from secret "threat disruption activities" to new cyber-attack powers, nearly all aspects of Bill C-59 remain the same. And nearly all the "problematic" aspects of Bill C-51 remain unfixed.

OSPCA search and seizure powers being challenged in court today

  OSPCA search and seizure powers being challenged in court today OSPCA search and seizure powers being challenged in court today Jeffrey Bogaerts — a paralegal and member of the Ontario Landowners Association — is scheduled to appear in a Perth, Ont., courtroom Wednesday to challenge the powers of OSPCA officers, who can enter a private residence without a warrant and seize an animal.

Opinion . "The next Conservative manifesto will promise to scrap the Human Rights Act. "And it's why the Conservative position is clear – if leaving the European convention is what it takes to fix our human rights laws , that is what we should do," she said to applause.

Are you saying non-citizens have no rights under our system of laws ? This article should have been titled " Liberals join Neil Gorsuch in 5-4 SCOTUS Opinion Striking Down Portion of Federal Law ". Part of the reason Trump won was because he promised to fix that mess and stop kicking the can

Government avoids fixing Bill C-59

The problems with Bill C-59 itself were apparent when it was tabled in Parliament in June 2017, and remain the same today. In September 2017, we along with 40 other organizations and experts raised those concerns in an open letter to the government, with no response. Since then, hundreds of Canadians have written to the Public Safety Committee, to their MPs and to Minister Goodale; 99 witnesses were heard and more than 40 briefs submitted; reports and op-eds have been published; the ICLMG has even produced a series of four videos breaking down the problems with the bill.

a man wearing a suit and tie: Canada's Minister of Public Security and Civil Protection Ralph Goodale.© Provided by AOL Inc. Canada's Minister of Public Security and Civil Protection Ralph Goodale.

What have the Liberals avoided addressing?

  • Bill C-59 grants vast new powers to Canada's spy agencies to collect our data without adequate protections. This includes information unrelated to national security threats, and vaguely defined "publicly available information." The new rules will essentially legalize mass surveillance.
  • Bill C-59 gives Canada's foreign signals intelligence agency, the Communications Security Establishment, new offensive cyber powers with little oversight or safeguards. Experts have said this will likely legitimize state sponsored hacking and disruption, and increase the risk of retaliation and the leaking of dangerous cyber weapons.
  • The bill fails to address the inherent problems of secrecy and lack of due process of Canada's No Fly List, which was entrenched with Bill C-51.
  • Bill C-59 maintains CSIS' new "threat reduction" powers, granted in Bill C-51, with minimal changes. These powers are in fact "disruption" powers that go far beyond the agency's previous intelligence-gathering mandate, allowing it to take on a wide range of real-world activities, in secret.
  • Invasive information-sharing rules based on a broader definition of "national security" brought in with Bill C-51 are allowed to continue without adequate safeguards.
  • Bill C-59 fails to reverse changes brought by Bill C-51 that further eroded due process in security certificate proceedings.
  • The minister of public safety would be able to decide, pending approval from the Intelligence Commissioner — which "acts or omissions that would otherwise constitute an offence" (i.e., activities that break a law) designated CSIS employees would either be able to carry out or instruct another individual to carry out.

Surprise new rules still won't ban intel tied to torture

In a surprise move at committee, the government also introduced an entirely new act, the Avoiding Complicity in Mistreatment by Foreign Entities Act. In introducing this new amendment, Liberal MP Michel Picard stated that it would "prevent complicity in cases of abuse by foreign entities, to make it very clear that Canada will not be an accomplice to torturers around the world."

Despite looming legalization, cannabis possession charges remain a reality

  Despite looming legalization, cannabis possession charges remain a reality An Edmonton man says a recent cannabis possession charge has put his business in jeopardy and left him frustrated with the state of the justice system in advance of legalization.Roman Lyubashenko said he was cruising the Anthony Henday Drive the morning of March 14 when he was pulled over by a Sherwood Park RCMP officer for having tinted windows.

By John Kirby, CNN National Security Analyst. Updated 1711 GMT (0111 HKT) December 19, 2017. 6. " Our strategy breaks from the damaging defense sequester. We're going to get rid of that." Follow CNN Opinion . Join us on Twitter and Facebook.

Our host's strong opinions on civil liberties and the false dichotomy that is privacy and security There are many of us who are non-Americans and the Liberal /Non- liberal views in security makes your so-called "impartial There is plenty of case law that on genuine matters of national security

While laudable, the new Act's purpose is actually very different: while it makes it mandatory for the government to issue directions to national security agencies on how to use information linked to torture, and mandates that those directions must be made public, it does not state what those directions must be.

  Opinion: Liberals' Broken Promise To Fix National Security Laws Risks Our Rights © Provided by AOL Inc.

In the past, governments provided these directions in secret, meaning the public had no way of knowing if there were directions, or what they were — clearly a big problem. Making the directions public, then, is a positive step. However, there is nothing in the Act that would mandate strong directions on information tied to torture, and simple transparency is not enough to ensure strong rules.

This Act also distracts from the fact that the Liberal government's directions to national security and law enforcement agencies on this issue, published in September 2017, still allow for information tied to torture to be used in exceptional circumstances — which I and others have criticized.

Review and oversight must be strengthened

Finally, Bill C-59 does establish two new review and oversight bodies: the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency (NSIRA), which will have the power to review all national security activities, and the Intelligence Commissioner (IC), who will approve surveillance authorizations granted to the CSE and to CSIS. Both these bodies are a step up from our current system of review agencies for CSIS, the CSE and the RCMP, which have restricted reach and no real-time oversight powers.

Ontario election promises a tax-and-borrow-and-spend jamboree: Neil Macdonald

  Ontario election promises a tax-and-borrow-and-spend jamboree: Neil Macdonald The battered, unpopular premier, Kathleen Wynne, and the apparently ascendant NDP leader, Andrea Horwath, are competing over how much they'll spend. And Doug Ford is no more credible than the other two. "Please tax us more," pleaded columnist Heather Mallick in the Toronto Star last week. (I can almost imagine Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne, grinning and high-fiving: "Can do, Heth! Gotcha covered.")Okay, I couldn 't resist that parenthetical snark. I think I can actually see what Mallick was trying to say – some modern variant of Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.'s famous quote: "I like taxes.

Liberals must decide which laws to fix , flush. Justin Trudeau to move on 'ambitious' agenda. Liberal refugee promise 'problematic'. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines.

Liberals ' broken promise to fix national security laws risks our rights #LPC #cdnpoli #BillC59 #CivilRights https Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in. Learn the latest. Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

The creation of the NSIRA and the IC is a move in the right direction. That is why it was so disheartening when Liberals on the Public Safety Committee voted against measures to increase the independence and effectiveness of both these bodies. Even with Bill C-59, multiple problems will continue:

  • Both agencies will be hampered by limited staffing (the Intelligence Commissioner is a part-time position, for example);
  • The NSIRA will not be able to make binding recommendations or provide redress if a complaint is found to be justified;
  • The Intelligence Commissioner will make decisions in secret, which as we've seen with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in the U.S., has lead to a near-100-per-cent approval of surveillance requests.
Justin Trudeau wearing a suit and tie: Prime Minister Justin Trudeau attends a meeting at the National Cyber Security Centre on April 18, 2018 in London, England.© Provided by AOL Inc. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau attends a meeting at the National Cyber Security Centre on April 18, 2018 in London, England.

Bad laws and broken promises undermine our rights

Even if the government improved the NSIRA and Intelligence Commissioner, though, good review and oversight can never make up for bad legislation. Instead, the bodies tasked with monitoring for errors and keeping the excesses of our national security agencies in check are forced to be rubber stamps reduced to making sure that bad laws aren't broken and justifying a system that undermines our rights.

More blogs from Tim McSorley on HuffPost Canada:

  • New National Security Act Falls Short, Even By Liberals' Own Standards
  • Liberals Undermining Goal Of Strong National Security Oversight
  • Reject Information Obtained Through Torture Once And For All

In an area as critical as national security, and on issues as substantial as our rights and freedoms, we deserve better. But all we've seen are broken promises.

Take action

Bill C-59 will be back in the House of Commons for the next round of debates in the coming weeks. You can voice your opposition to Bill C-59, and speak out in support of civil liberties, by sending a message to your MP and the government here.

This article originally appeared on AMP: HuffPost Canada at https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/tim-mcsorley/liberals-bill-c-59-national-security-promises_a_23434631/

Liberals promise debt-cutting legislation .
TORONTO - The Ontario Liberals promised new legislation on Saturday that would reduce the province's debt, saying they were presenting the only realistic financial plan between the three major parties. Liberal Leader Kathleen Wynne said that in years when the province beats its own fiscal projections — something she noted her party has done for the past four years — the proposed legislation would require 100 per cent of unspent money to go towards reducing debt.The governing Liberals made the promise as they launched their full campaign platform, much of which was similar to the government's latest budget released in March.

Source: http://ca.pressfrom.com/news/canada/-75021-opinion-liberals-broken-promise-to-fix-national-security-laws-risks-our-rights/

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!